Blogs, when they work as they are supposed to, are dialogs between the author and his or her readers.

For a long time, my blog has been largely a one way street with me publishing a note and you, dear reader, checking it out when you happen to think you’d like to see what ole Perry has been up to. There have been a couple of notable exceptions, of course, like my cousin Bowen who has been diligent in encouraging me (thank you, Bowen) with regular emails in which he comments on what I’ve written or nudging me gently to remind me that I haven’t posted anything here in a while. Also my friend, David Steele, often drops me an email about something I’ve posted here.

I’m pleased to see, however, that we’ve recently gotten over the hurdle of posting comments successfully as this series of comments to my post on July 30th illustrates. This success, though, creates the need for a new reading style when reviewing this, or any other, blog. The real action is now likely to be taking place in the comments section, and you won’t see that unless you click on the Comments link below each post, even if you may not be intending to leave a comment when you do so. Also I should point out that, if you post anonymously and I don’t already have your email address, the only way I’ll have to respond to your comment is by leaving a comment myself in that section. So when you do leave a comment, don’t forget to check back in that section to see whether there is a response to your comment. For your information, Blogger sends me an email when someone leaves a comment, so I will know it if you leave one.

A good example of a blog with a rich and active comment section is PressThink, Jay Rosen’s excellent blog about journalism. This post there illustrates what I am talking about. In his introduction to his blog, he explains what he tries to do with his blog and what his goals are. Now, Jay Rosen is a somebody, a known and important voice in what has come to be called the blogosphere, and his blog is read by far more people than read mine, but his work does illustrate the concept of what I’ve dubbed the “dia-blog.”

I realize that the blogs that generate the most comments are those that espouse some controversial point of view as many of the political blogs do. I’ve chosen to write a blog that is mostly applehood and mother pie where I share my views about life on the Internet and to a degree about the events in my personal life and my thoughts about them, so I recognize that such posts don’t create as great a need to comment as a blog with a different goal might. Still I would expect that those discovery posts about something on the Internet might raise a question or two for you, and I would invite you to raise those questions in comments to such posts. I’ll try to clarify the significance as I see it about those discoveries for you, and together we’ll both understand better some of the things that the Internet makes possible.

I’ll close this by saying “thanks” to those of you who have stuck with me and continued to experiment with learning to post comments through the time when we were having trouble doing that. I’m glad we have this channel to carry on a conversation. And I look forward to our future conversations through this dia-blog.


2 thoughts on “Dia-Blog

  1. Jeffrey Davidson

    Well, I’m not sure a blog really is a dialogue between author and reader. Sure, I’ve heard the conversation about how all reading becomes a dialog in the readers’ heads, but I’m not sure I completely buy into the theory. Too may times I just attempt to escape within a book, and I am not considering the words on a page any more than I consider an actor on a small or big screen. I sit, I let the action take me somewhere, I stop.And I am not sure blogs were originally meant to be a two-way dialogue. I’m newer to blogging, but I think the advent of comments and replys was not the original intent. Maybe an early innovation, but original intent? Of course, they could have been…And then we get to the author’s purpose. Isn’t it appropriate to think that some authors just want readers to be amused, rather than carry on a dialogue. And some authors are the audience, with no intent of it going further.And, lastly, I’m sorry. Who needs my rambling? Because I agree with you! I love it when I get comments on my blog. The only running conversation are about politics, which I’m not sure I like, but hey, it’s a dialogue and I love that!

  2. Perry

    Hi, Jeffrey. Thanks for your comment. I can’t disagree with you that often blogs aren’t always dia-blogs. In fact for the first 100 or so posts to mine, those posts were more mono-blogging than anything else. And I concede that we each may have different reasons for creating a blog. In my case, for instance, I began this blog just to see if I could do it and whether I could sustain the enthusiasm for the task over time. I’ve met that goal, so my goals have changed. Like you, I enjoy it when someone chooses to comment on something I have written, even if they disagree with me. In fact, I suspect people are more likely to comment if they disagree than if they agree.But many blogs do invite and provoke comment. When they do, I think they become more than just an exercise in self-indulgence. Who knows why “God” created them originally? Mine has become an enjoyable pasttime, and I welcome its transition into a conversation, if that’s what it becomes. And that’s particularly true when I hear from someone like you who isn’t a relative or business associate. And now, thanks to your comment here, I have a reason to check out what you have done with your blog(s).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s